Showing posts with label social media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social media. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Awareness and simplification: The KONY 2012 campaign

To increase the awareness level of a message, advertisers and campaign managers know well about the psychological effects of simplifying matters on people’s attention. Short communications are persuasive and affect people’s readiness to engage in different kind of actions. However, short communications have to simplify complex topics an may lead to the problem of not taking into account the entirety of a complex problem, for example by focusing only on a specific relationship among many affected interest groups. To avoid a misleading reduction of complex issues, I argue that the intention to increase the level of people’s awareness by simplifying communications should be accompanied by a careful consideration of the corresponding impacts in a more fine-grained stakeholder network. An insightful example is the viral campaign KONY 2012, which entered the social media in early March 2012.
The core of the KONY 2012 campaign is a short film created by the non-profit organization Invisible Children, Inc. The film documents the brutal abduction and cruel abuse of children by Joseph Kony and his Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) to use them as child soldiers in an ongoing conflict in northern Uganda. The LRA is a guerilla group and its leader, Joseph Kony, was indicted for war crimes and crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Court in 2005, but still has evaded capture.
 
The KONY 2012 short film spread virally in the World Wide Web, mainly through social media channels like YouTube, Vimeo, Facebook and Twitter. Within a month the clip had been viewed more than 90 million times and the social media campaign raised a tremendous awareness all over the world. Celebrities and politicians started to support the concerns of Invisible Children, Inc. to bring Joseph Kony to justice.
However, criticism about simplifying the complex conflict in northern Uganda arose shortly after the film’s release. Invisible Children, Inc. was accused of providing a black-and-white picture of the situation and of manipulating the public opinion. For example, the film suggests that violence in northern Uganda will come to an end and the abducted children will be able to return to their families as soon as Joseph Kony would be captured. Of course, Kony is a dangerous and cruel individual and bringing him to justice would be important. But reducing the problems in northern Uganda to the faith of Joseph Kony is deceptive. The history of the conflict is far more complex and includes many other interest groups like, for example, the Ugandan army and government, of which many seem highly suspicious too. Further, the film neglects the fact that most LRA forces, including Joseph Kony, fled northern Uganda in 2006 to be dispersed now across three neighboring countries.
 
As the example of KONY 2012 shows, awareness and simplification have to be balanced so that creators of social media campaigns are able to achieve their objectives and at the same time meet their responsibility towards other stakeholder groups affected by complex problems. The narrow spotlight on Joseph Kony led Invisible Children, Inc. to donate funds to support military action for capturing the LRA leader. But what about the rehabilitation and reintegration of former child soldiers as another affected interest group?

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The Empowerment of a Tiny Shareholder through Blogging

Corruption defines the Russian public live at all levels. In the Corruption Perception Index 2011 by Transparency International, Russia is on the rank 143 from 182 (http://snipurl.com/243n31f). It shares this position with countries like Nigeria, Belarus and Mauritania. Preparing for the Winter Olympics 2014 in Sochi, corruption reached such extremes that businesses involved in preparing the Black Sea resort report having to pay kickbacks of more than fifty percent. A Russian magazine calculated that a road in Sochi is so costly that it could have been paved with three and a half inches of Louis Vuitton handbags (http://snipurl.com/2439t4z)!

Former President Dmitry Medvedev was eager to fight corruption in his country. One measure was the online posting of all government requests for tender initiated in 2008. Nonetheless it is said that the size of the average bribe quadrupled. In 2010 three percent of the Russian GDP disappeared annually on government contracts. On the one hand the increase of corruption can be explained by the growing risk of accepting bribes. As it became riskier the price went up. On the other hand people fear that everything is going to collapse, so they want to grab as much as they can (http://snipurl.com/2439t4z). However, thanks to Medvedev’s initiative the prominent blogger Navalny could launch his latest project, the web site RosPil. With the help of citizens the site collects information on obvious violation within the governmental procurement system.  

In 2007 Navalny’s campaign against corruption began by buying small stakes in publicly traded state-owned companies, which normally have senior government officials in their boards. Through public listings these companies can obtain crucial capital and international legitimacy. In exchange public listings force them to a modicum of transparency that is absent from Russian politics (http://snipurl.com/243apl0). By using his status as a part owner, Navalny harasses senior management with unpleasant and delicate questions for example about suspicious expenses. Navalny publishes all his uncovering of wary acts and his efforts for the rights of minority shareholders in major Russian oil and gas companies, banks and government ministries on his blog (also available in English). With these actions Navalny demonstrates that stock can be more effective in controlling Russia’s ruling class than the ballot box. He earned many admirers in the Russian blogosphere and the independent-minded media. In Russia the blogosphere is a very important forum for free political discussion and gives people an opportunity to become civic activists. Through his blog the stakeholder, who was originally a shareholder interested in a secure investment, became a stakeholder, who is representing the civil society in his fight against the corruption that pervades Russian business and government.  

In December 2010 Navalny launched RosPil.net. The idea for RosPil came up when Navalny heard about the invitation of the Ministry of Health and Social Development to build a two-million-dollar network to connect doctors and patients. The winner of the contract had only sixteen days to develop the site. Navalny was sure that the webpage had already been designed for a much lower sum. He asked his blog followers to send official complaints to the Federal Anti-Monopoly Agency. Nearly 2’000 of them did. The Health Ministry annulled the contract. The idea was born to design a site where people can submit a government request for tender and discuss it. If an associated expert finds the price, the schedule etc. unreasonable Navalny posts the alleged fraud on his blog (http://snipurl.com/2439t4z). Since RosPil started, more than a thousand users and 500 experts have registered to it. According to a tally on the webpage, the project has caused requests for tender worth 6.6 million US-Dollars, to be annulled.  

This example shows that even a tiny shareholder can become an important stakeholder, who can alienate the powerful. Furthermore it demonstrates that things can be changed by enforcing the dialogue between the stakeholders and the companies. By the help of social media Navalny has become a representative of the civil society. We should always keep in mind that Navalny has undertaken all this in a country where a number of people investigating such matters have been beaten or murdered.

Sabrina Stucki

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

I Paid a Bribe – Ordinary People Fight Corrupt Bureaucrats

What are the costs of getting a professor post in Hyderabad India? 380’000 rupees (~ $7’500). The expenses of obtaining a driving license vary from 100 to 3’500 rupees. The purchase of the international driving license costs even 5’000 rupees (~$95).
This is the price of so called “retail corruption”, the sort of petty bribery that affects everyday life in many parts of the world.

Swati Ramanathan and her husband set out to change all this in August 2010.[1] They started the webpage ipaidabribe.com to uncover the market price of corruption. On the site people can anonymously report bribes they paid, bribes that were requested but not paid and requests that were expected but not forthcoming. The webpage offers detailed analysis of the bribes reported so far concerning the departments and the cities where corruption occurs. In India for example as well as in Kenya the police department is the organization that asks most often for extraordinary “fees”.

The webpage is booming: up until now it received 400’000 reports of illicit payments for routine work. In the first three days of April, already more than 20 bribe payments have been reported in India. The webpage idea is spreading around the globe. Nongovernmental and governmental organizations from at least 17 countries have contacted Janaagraha, the nonprofit organization in Bangalore that operates ipaidabribe.com. The organizations were asking about setting up a site of their own. In Kenya for example the site is operated under the same name and in Pakistan it is called ipaidbribe.pk. The Pakistani site estimates that over the last four years the country’s economy has lost about $94 billion to corruption, tax evasion and weak governance!

All these websites, even if no names are given and the reports therefore cannot be verified, have got an impact. This impact is threatening enough that when similar sites popped up in China last summer, the government stamped them out within a couple of weeks, contending they had failed to register with the authorities. In Bangalore for example, ipaidabribe.com helped to push through reforms in the motor vehicle department. Citizen apply now online for licenses.

Thanks to social media the average person obtained powerful tools to fight endemic corruption. By reading the bribe payers reports you get an idea about the anger and shame people feel by paying bribes to officials. The anonymity provided by the internet gives people the chance to talk about their experiences concerning the contacts with officials in everyday life. These exchanges over the internet serve as an awareness raising instrument. People get aware of other concerned people who are totally upset about this corruption. Social media gives them the possibility to demand change. Corruption is therefore no more seen as a problem that ordinary people cannot do anything about it. Based on this awareness social movements against corruption can grow and corruption can be tackled by harnessing the collective energy of citizens.


Sabrina Stucki

[1] The following information is based on the article „Web Sites Shine Light on Petty Bribery Worldwide“, The New York Times, 06.03.2012 and on the webpage www.ipaidabribe.com