Leaders are human beings
Leadership seems
not to be divisible; it absorbs the person totally. This credo is accepted in
business but also in politics. We experienced this already four years ago when
Barack Obama was elected President. Even though he had small children at the
time, there was barely any discussion of how he could carry out the two
responsibilities, namely the Presidency and fatherhood. But if Michelle Obama
had been elected President, certainly everybody would have been discussing this
matter. The difference in judging the same situation between a man and a woman
is even more astonishing, as both are well educated and successful in their
profession.
Recently a
similar situation occurred in Switzerland. A 39 year old (young!) man, Alain
Berset, was elected as Swiss Federal Council. His wife is also very
successful in her profession. The couple has three young children. Again there
was little public discussion that Alain Berset as Federal Council will barely
have time to see his three children. We – as a culture - obviously think it is
more important that our leaders carry out their professional tasks full-time,
rather than that they spend part of their time with family duties. We consider
that their duties lie in their professional life and not in their private life
as human beings. This is especially true for men.
This
understanding asks either for specific personalities and values for leaders, or
that failing, it accepts that leaders simply bear the stress due to the tension
between their professional and private lives. What is however mostly overlooked
is that the values and personalities of such leaders also influence the
understanding of leadership in society, which thus far emphasizes an
instrumental and not human oriented worldview. Moreover, it hinders men to
think about their multiple roles, and how they might coordinate them with their
partners.
But why should it
not be thinkable that an American President or a Swiss Federal Council work
part time? And more provocatively, that a man actually asks to work part time
as President or Federal Council? Are the experiences of parenthood so
negligible that we prefer our leaders to just be professionals?
If we don't start
to see our leaders more as human beings, we can’t expect that they will be
humanly oriented. We should change our priorities in this respect. In case
studies we carried out with students at the University of Zurich and also in
other studies (see e.g. Shellenback, K. (2004). Child Care & Parent
Productivity: Making the Business Case), it becomes obvious that shared
leadership in firms, leads to higher motivation but also to additional
competences based on the experiences of parenthood. These studies also make
clear that we need more leaders who are asking for shared leadership and more
examples of good practices. So let us look for new ways of leadership in 2012.
I am looking forward to your experiences on our blog.
Sybille Sachs
No comments:
Post a Comment