Responsibility towards the Stakeholders
Globalization
has made the boundaries between politics and economy blurred, thereby making
the world more interdependent. In the last decades, the labor separation
between politics and the economy underwent considerable change. Due to this internationalization,
governmental constraints on firms may be less effective often resulting in a
“race to the bottom” that pits state against state. A so called laissez-faire
mentality was a common practice.
But the
current financial crisis challenged this way of thinking. The private sector
expected the governments to take responsibility for the functioning of the
economy and the welfare of the nation.
Unfortunately
governments are made up of politicians who want to be reelected. Politicians
aren’t saints. They are part of a party, have got a network and act in their
self or partisan-interest. One example was this summer’s debt debate in the
United States of America. The months of partisan fighting resulted in the
downgrading of the US’s AAA credit rating (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-06/u-s-credit-rating-cut-by-s-p-for-first-time-on-deficit-reduction-accord.html )
by the rating agency Standard & Poor.
There are top
managers who want government to also consider the concerns of the country, in a
way that they themselves consider the concerns of the company’s mutual
stakeholders. Indeed, the gridlock and partisanship in Washington D.C. provoked
some top managers to formulate clear expectations towards government. A well known example is Warren Buffet’s statement “Stop
Coddling the Super-Rich” in a New York Times opinion page. He concludes with
the words: “My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a
billionaire-friendly Congress. It’s time for our government to get serious
about shared sacrifice.” (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/15/opinion/stop-coddling-the-super-rich.html )
Or take the CEO of Starbucks, Howard Schultz, who called for a boycott on
campaign contributions to either party until the elected leaders of the United
States of America put aside their political posturing and find some common
ground on long-term fiscal issues (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/15/starbucks-howard-schultz-boycott-campaign-contributions_n_927550.html ).
This kind of debate,
however, doesn’t only exist in America. Also in Europe managers have clearly
expressed their expectations of politicians. Diego Della Valle for example, CEO
of Tod’s, published an article with the title “Politici ora basta”
(Politicians, now it’s enough). He states in Italian newspapers that the
politicians’ selfish behavior disregards the concerns of the country and
damages the reputation of Italy (http://www.corriere2000.it/2011/10/politici-ora-basta/
).
These
examples show that some top managers realized that an organization can’t be
sustainably successful in today’s world without the inclusion of all the
stakeholders. No company and no market economy can be sustained without heeding
the needs of employees or citizens (Swissquote Magazin Nov/11, 67).
Instead of
concentrating on short term goals like increasing the shareholder value or
winning elections, decisions should be made based on sustainable thinking and
by including all relevant stakeholders.
Sabrina
Stucki
No comments:
Post a Comment